Start a New Search
SHOWING 145 RESULTS
AAU, today said that a House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology inquiry targeting some 60 NSF grants “is having a destructive effect on NSF and on the merit review process.”
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | Press ReleasesWe are troubled by these inquiries and urge the Committee to recognize how this ill-defined investigation will harm the scientific enterprise we all support.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsPeer review offers several important benefits to federal agencies, researchers, and the nation.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | Issue BriefLetter to Darrell E. Issa and James Lankford regarding the Grant Reform and New Transparency (GRANT) Act of 2011.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsCoalition to Promote Research letter supporting NIH funding.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | LettersRegarding comments made by President Bush in his State of Union address on earmarking.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRequest for collection of information on earmarks.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | MemoAAU issued a statement in 2005 concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. It noted that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsEducation organizations offer their thoughts on the legislation to extend the Perkins Loan program proposed to the Senate.
Student Loans | Student Aid | LettersDo federal tuition grants and subsidized loans help students afford college, or do they simply encourage colleges and universities to raise tuition? Robert Archibald and David Feldman research the answers to these questions.
Student Aid | Affordability and Student Aid | Reports