Start a New Search
SHOWING 58 RESULTS
We are troubled by these inquiries and urge the Committee to recognize how this ill-defined investigation will harm the scientific enterprise we all support.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsPeer review offers several important benefits to federal agencies, researchers, and the nation.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | Issue BriefLetter to Darrell E. Issa and James Lankford regarding the Grant Reform and New Transparency (GRANT) Act of 2011.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsCoalition to Promote Research letter supporting NIH funding.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | LettersRegarding comments made by President Bush in his State of Union address on earmarking.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRequest for collection of information on earmarks.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | MemoAAU issued a statement in 2005 concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. It noted that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsAAU urges Congress to provide $155 million for the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Federal Budget | Agency Budgets | National Endowment for the Humanities | FY16 | Fact SheetsSenators urge President's request for NEH and NEA funding in FY16.
Federal Budget | Agency Budgets | National Endowment for the Humanities | FY16 | Lettersstatement by Hunter Rawlings, President of the Association of American Universities (AAU), on the deep cut proposed for the National Endowment for the Humanities in the FY15 appropriations bill approved July 9 by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.
Humanities | National Endowment for the Humanities | Federal Budget | Statements