Start a New Search
SHOWING 33 RESULTS
We are troubled by these inquiries and urge the Committee to recognize how this ill-defined investigation will harm the scientific enterprise we all support.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsPeer review offers several important benefits to federal agencies, researchers, and the nation.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | Issue BriefLetter to Darrell E. Issa and James Lankford regarding the Grant Reform and New Transparency (GRANT) Act of 2011.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsCoalition to Promote Research letter supporting NIH funding.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | LettersRegarding comments made by President Bush in his State of Union address on earmarking.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRequest for collection of information on earmarks.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | MemoAAU issued a statement in 2005 concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. It noted that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsThe amendments proposed by the PHS are significant and will alter the relationship between a research institution, its investigators, and the PHS.
Research Administration & Regulation | Conflicts of Interest | LettersLetter to Chris B. Pascal, J.D., Director, Office of Research Integrity, Re: Public Health Service Po
licies on Research Misconduct
Conflicts of Interest | Research Administration & Regulation | LettersUniversity presidents urge expanded campus oversight of potential conflicts of interest in research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Conflicts of Interest | Press Releases