Start a New Search
SHOWING 56 RESULTS
A group representing thousands of innovative companies, universities, and organizations and millions of workers in the United States write to express serious concerns with the direction of patent legislation.
Intellectual Property | Patents | LettersGroups representing thousands of innovative companies, universities, and organizations and millions of workers in the United States write to express their serious concerns with the direction of patent legislation. It is our belief that the future of the U.S. economy and our ability to compete…
Intellectual Property | Patents | LettersUniversity comments on legislative proposals to curb abusive patent practices.
Intellectual Property | Patents | LettersSix university, medical college, and higher education associations write to commend The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy on the introduction of S. 1720 and the initial hearing on the legislation held December 17, 2013, and to request an opportunity for universities to testify at another hearing as a…
Intellectual Property | Patents | LettersSix organizations write to commend Chairman Leahy and co-sponsors Senators Lee, Whitehouse, and Klobuchar for introducing legislation effectively focused on curbing abusive patent litigation practices while preserving the ability of patent holders effectively to enforce their patent rights.
Intellectual Property | Patents | StatementsSix national higher education associations collectively representing over 2,000 colleges and universities, write to express our opposition to H.R. 3309, the Innovation Act, in its current form.
Intellectual Property | Patents | StatementsStatement on Norvir March-in Petition, Ted Poehler, Johns Hopkins University, May 25, 2004.
Intellectual Property | Patents | Research Administration & Regulation | Technology Transfer | Testimony | The Johns Hopkins UniversityComments from AAU, APLU, and the Council on Governmental Relations on the ITAR Amendment – Revisions to Definitions; Data Transmission and Storage (RIN 1400-AD70), August 3, 2015.
Science & Security | Biological & Chemical Security | Export Controls | Security Classification | CommentsComments from AAU, APLU, COGR on the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security Revisions to Definitions in the Export Administration Regulations (RIN 0694-AG32), August 3, 2015.
Science & Security | Biological & Chemical Security | Export Controls | CommentsAAU and COGR respond to the June 29, 2011 Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Safeguarding Unclassified DoD information (DFARS Case 2011 D039).
Science & Security | Biological & Chemical Security | Export Controls | Security Classification | Comments