Start a New Search
SHOWING 54 RESULTS
Peer review offers several important benefits to federal agencies, researchers, and the nation.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | Issue BriefLetter to Darrell E. Issa and James Lankford regarding the Grant Reform and New Transparency (GRANT) Act of 2011.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsCoalition to Promote Research letter supporting NIH funding.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | LettersRegarding comments made by President Bush in his State of Union address on earmarking.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRequest for collection of information on earmarks.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | MemoAAU issued a statement in 2005 concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. It noted that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRecommendations for the 2013 Farm Bill
Federal Budget | Agency Budgets | Agriculture & Food Research Initiative | LettersLetter to Farm Bill conferees
Federal Budget | Agency Budgets | Agriculture & Food Research Initiative | LettersAAU supports $450 million for AFRI in FY16.
Federal Budget | Agency Budgets | Agriculture & Food Research Initiative | FY16 | Fact SheetsFollowing is a statement by AAU on the introduction of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act by Senators Gardner and Peters.
Innovation and Competitiveness | National Science Foundation | Merit Review | Technology Transfer | Department of Energy | Statements