Start a New Search
SHOWING 153 RESULTS
We are troubled by these inquiries and urge the Committee to recognize how this ill-defined investigation will harm the scientific enterprise we all support.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsPeer review offers several important benefits to federal agencies, researchers, and the nation.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | Issue BriefLetter to Darrell E. Issa and James Lankford regarding the Grant Reform and New Transparency (GRANT) Act of 2011.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsCoalition to Promote Research letter supporting NIH funding.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | LettersRegarding comments made by President Bush in his State of Union address on earmarking.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRequest for collection of information on earmarks.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | MemoAAU issued a statement in 2005 concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. It noted that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsLetter regarding an appropriate balance between government's need for accountability for federal expenditures and colleges and universities to retain responsibility and control over their academic missions.
Accreditation & Accountability | Higher Education Legislation | LettersComments on accreditation which performs a critical role in U.S. higher education.
Accreditation & Accountability | Higher Education Legislation | LettersTestimony on "Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Combating Campus Sexual Assault."
Higher Education Legislation | Campus Climate and Safety | Testimony