Start a New Search
SHOWING 26 RESULTS
AAU, The Association of Medical Colleges, Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, AUTM, and Council on Governmental Relations released a statement in support of the introduction of the SUCCESS Act.
Intellectual Property | StatementsAAU Board of Directors October 21, 2018 approved a statement concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. The statement notes that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Merit Review | Research Administration & Regulation | StatementsThe study, which sensibly attempts to draw distinctions among the widely varied business models of actors in the patent system, supports our long-held position that any efforts to reduce abusive litigation practices must be narrowly tailored to address the small minority of patent holders that are…
Patents | Intellectual Property | StatementsAAU Technology Transfer working group proposes steps universities can take to better align policies and practices with the public interest.
Technology Transfer | Intellectual Property | Research Administration & Regulation | StatementsReply to Chairman Smith’s response to the AAU statement on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee’s inquiries into NSF research grants.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsWe are troubled by these inquiries and urge the Committee to recognize how this ill-defined investigation will harm the scientific enterprise we all support.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsLetter to Darrell E. Issa and James Lankford regarding the Grant Reform and New Transparency (GRANT) Act of 2011.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsRegarding comments made by President Bush in his State of Union address on earmarking.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsAAU issued a statement in 2005 concerning Congressional earmarking of federal research funds. It noted that earmarks may reduce the capacity of federal research agencies that sponsor merit-based competitions to support the most promising research.
Research Administration & Regulation | Merit Review | StatementsStatement on Expanded Public Access to Data, May 16, 2013, National Research Council, NAS Forum
Intellectual Property | Statements